State v. Lundstedt
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction on two counts of assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175. We affirm defendant’s convictions, but remand for resentencing.
Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in several particulars. We write to address only his third assignment of error, that the court, in imposing sentence, erroneously failed to apply the so-called “shift-to-1” rule, OAR 253-12-020(2)(a). We reject his other assignments without further comment.
The court imposed consecutive 20-month sentences for defendant’s two assault convictions. Those sentences were based on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Rojas-MontalvoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. MonroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. SosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. CarrilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017