Legal Opinion

State v. Lundstedt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 1996No. 93-5325; CA A86308PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction on two counts of assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175. We affirm defendant’s convictions, but remand for resentencing.

Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in several particulars. We write to address only his third assignment of error, that the court, in imposing sentence, erroneously failed to apply the so-called “shift-to-1” rule, OAR 253-12-020(2)(a). We reject his other assignments without further comment.

The court imposed consecutive 20-month sentences for defendant’s two assault convictions. Those sentences were based on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Rojas-MontalvoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State v. MonroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. SosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. CarrilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API