Legal Opinion

Gardner v. North Carolina State Bar

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1986No. 706PA84PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The parties to this action have brought a single question before this Court: May a licensed attorney who is a full-time employee of an insurance company ethically represent one of the company’s insureds as counsel of record in an action brought by a third party for a claim covered by the terms of the insurance policy or appear as counsel of record for the insured in the prosecution of a subrogation claim for property damage? We hold that under North Carolina law, the answer is no.

Petitioners 1 presented this question to respondent Bar on 13 January 1982 with a request that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. STATE BAR ASSN. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. North Carolina State Bar v. DuMontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. McMichael v. ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Matter of Alamance County Ct. FacilitiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Petition of YoungbloodTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Beard v. North Carolina State BarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee v. American Home Assurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API