Parman ex rel. Parman v. Lemmon ex rel. Lemmon

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This controversy involves a construction of the statute concerning dangerous weapons — whether shotguns come within its purview, and whether minors are prohibited from handling and using them. The case was submitted in July, 1925, and a decision, rendered in October following, holding that shotguns were *371within its purview and their use prohibited to minors. On application, a rehearing was granted and the case again argued.

The facts, briefly recited in the former opinion (Parman v. Lemmon, 119 Kan. 323, 239 Pac. 989), were as follows:

“The…