Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Stancil

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1960No. 22Published

1Opinion of the Court

116 S.E.2d 817 (1960)

253 N.C. 291

Carl C. JACKSON, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph E. Taylor, Deceased,

v.

Thomas E. STANCIL, Jr., d/b/a Stancil Flying Service, and Joseph Morena Rivera.

Deward SMITH

v.

Thomas E. STANCIL, Jr., d/b/a Stancil Flying Service, and Joseph Morena Rivera.

No. 22.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 9, 1960.

Eugene Forrest Gordman, Norfolk, Va., LeRoy Scott and McMullan & McMullan, Washington, for plaintiffs.

Rodman & Rodman and Wilkinson & Ward, Washington, for defendant Stancil.

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant Stancil assigns as error the refusal of the court to allow his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. State v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Smith v. O'DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cushing v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Fish v. Chapman & RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API