Legal Opinion

Libman-Spanjer Corp. v. Royal Hall, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

Plaintiffs, general creditors of Royal Hall, Inc., bring this action to set aside an alleged fraudulent transfer of funds belonging to the debtor, to the extent necessary to satisfy their claims. The defendant Perlmutter, the assignee of a judgment creditor of Royal Hall, Inc., who was directed to be brought in as a party to the action by an order of the court, asserts a counterclaim by which she likewise seeks to have the transfer set aside. She prays that a receiver be appointed for the property of the debtor corporation, and “ that the proceeds of all such property be justly and fairly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Edmeston v. LydeNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  3. First National Bank v. . ShulerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. National Tradesmen's Bank v. WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. M'Dermutt v. StrongNew York Court of Chancery · 1820

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Emrich v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Libman-Spanjer Corp. v. Royal Hall, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
  3. In re Universal Travel & Auto Sports Show, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API