Libman-Spanjer Corp. v. Royal Hall, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
This is a motion to strike out the counterclaim contained in the second amended answer of the defendant Perlmutter. On a previous motion it was held that the plaintiffs did not acquire a specific lien upon the funds in suit by the commencement of this action, although the motion to strike out the counterclaim was granted because of purely formal defects of pleading (Libman-Spanjer Corporation v. Royal Hall, Inc., 146 Misc. 348). The plaintiffs now question the correctness of the conclusion expressed in the opinion on the previous motion. They contend that a lien has been created in their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Edmeston v. LydeNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
- First National Bank v. . ShulerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Brown v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- M'Dermutt v. StrongNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of HaberNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934