Legal Opinion

Kirkland v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 25, 2000No. A00A0389PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Richard Kirkland appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Pioneer Machinery, Inc. and Richard Harrelson. Kirkland claims the trial court erred because a jury question remains as to whether Kirkland justifiably relied on Harrelson’s fraudulent representations that he was not going to be fired. Because the promises upon which Kirkland claims he relied were unenforceable, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). To obtain summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Supchak v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Ely v. Stratoflex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Alston v. BROWN TRANSPORT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Jacobs v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marshall v. King & MorgensternCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Mitchell v. Georgia Department of Community HealthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Edwards v. Central Georgia HHS, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Petrakopoulos v. VranasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. nVision Global Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Cardinal Health 5, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API