Legal Opinion
Supchak v. Pruitt
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 27, 1998No. A98A0795PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
Karl and Beverly Supchak appeal the grant of summary judgment to Ruth W. Pruitt and to Boyce Pruitt d/b/a Boyce Pruitt Livestock & Feed under OCGA § 9-11-56 (h). The case remains pending below against Boyce Pruitt individually. Ruth Pruitt lives on her one hundred forty-acre farm in Gwinnett County, and her son Boyce Pruitt lives with his family on an adjoining seven-acre property that was deeded to him by his mother.
The Supchaks filed suit against Boyce Pruitt, individually, Ruth W. Pruitt, and Boyce Pruitt d/b/a Boyce Pruitt Livestock & Feed to recover for damages…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Moore v. Goldome Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Goring v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Kissun v. Humana, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- White v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Holloman v. D. R. Horton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Jones v. Board of Regents of the University SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Berry v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Johnson v. American National Red CrossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- White v. BDO Seidman, LLPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.