State v. Wilson
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCynthia Westcott Rice, J.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Dawud Wilson, appeals his conviction and sentence, following his no contest plea to robbery and a repeat violent offender specification, in the Lake County Court of Common Pleas. The principal issue is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant's motion to suppress. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On June 1, 2015, appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery, a felony-one, with a repeat violent offender ("RVO") specification (Count 1); robbery, a felony-two, with an RVO specification (Count 2); and receiving stolen property, a felony-five (Count 3).…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LaRosa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. GoneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. HustonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. SlepskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.