Montelepre Systemed, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
Taxpayer Montelepre Systemed, Inc. (Systemed) gave up one of its rights under a management contract in exchange for money. The Tax Court characterized the payment that Systemed received as compensation taxable under 26 U.S.C. § 83 in the first year that Systemed’s right ceased being subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. We hold that Systemed’s right was subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture until Systemed disposed of that right, and that the assignment-of-income doctrine precludes application of 26 U.S.C. § 337 to the payment that Systemed received. We…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Cumberland Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Helvering v. EubankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hillsboro National Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anthony Theophilos Patricia A. Theophilos v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Childs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
- Crescent Holdings, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- AidooUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- Childs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.