Legal Opinion

Montelepre Systemed, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1992No. 91-4395PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

Taxpayer Montelepre Systemed, Inc. (Systemed) gave up one of its rights under a management contract in exchange for money. The Tax Court characterized the payment that Systemed received as compensation taxable under 26 U.S.C. § 83 in the first year that Systemed’s right ceased being subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. We hold that Systemed’s right was subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture until Systemed disposed of that right, and that the assignment-of-income doctrine precludes application of 26 U.S.C. § 337 to the payment that Systemed received. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. Cumberland Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Helvering v. EubankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Hillsboro National Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anthony Theophilos Patricia A. Theophilos v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Childs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  3. Crescent Holdings, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  4. AidooUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  5. Childs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API