Legal Opinion
Lindo v. Mullaney
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 19, 2003No. AC 22681PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*829 Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The petitioner, Barrington Lindo, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he claimed that he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly (1) failed to conclude that he was denied effective assistance of counsel under the test enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984), (2) failed to consider expert testimony concerning his counsel’s allegedly deficient performance and (3)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. DePastinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LaSalleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Lindo v. MullaneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003