State v. Israel
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FREEMAN, Justice.
We address two questions in this appeal of defendant’s conviction for murder — first, whether the State’s evidence was sufficient to warrant its submission to the jury, and second, whether certain evidence tending to exonerate defendant and implicate another in this crime was erroneously excluded from the jury’s consideration. We conclude that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the State, was sufficient to warrant its submission to the jury and to sustain defendant’s conviction of murder in the first degree. But no matter how ample and damning this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- McDonald v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. NaborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.