Legal Opinion
Ulrich v. Minneapolis Boxing and Wrestling Club, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 12, 1964No. 38,984, 38,985Published
1Opinion of the Court
268 Minn. 328 (1964)
129 N.W. (2d) 288
CARL ULRICH
v.
MINNEAPOLIS BOXING AND WRESTLING CLUB, INC. AND OTHERS.
Nos. 38,984, 38,985.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 12, 1964.
Hanson & Grinley, for appellant Minneapolis Boxing and Wrestling Club, Inc.
Sturtz, Peterson, Sturtz & Butler, for appellant Albert Lea Junior Chamber of Commerce, Inc.
Peterson, Peterson & Tuveson, for respondent Ulrich.
SHERAN, JUSTICE.
Appeals from a judgment of the district court.
On September 15, 1960, plaintiff, Carl Ulrich, sustained personal injury. Thereafter, he instituted the present action against defendants on the theory…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Vanderhule v. BerinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Dincher v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.