Legal Opinion

Buckey v. McGraw

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 9910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiffs sued to quiet their title to an improved residence lot in the county of Los Angeles. By answer the defendants denied the plaintiffs’ title and by cross-complaint sought to recover from the plaintiffs the sum of $950, which was the amount of the initial payment from the defendants to the plaintiffs under a contract of conditional purchase and sale of said property. The contract was dated February 16, 1925, and provided for the total payment of $5,300—$950 upon the execution of the instrument, $45 on the twenty-third day of March, 1925, and $45 on the twenty-third day of each…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwerin Estate Realty Co. v. SlyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Asher v. HullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Koch v. GlennIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Maxfield v. BurttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API