Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Poo On

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1920No. Crim. No. 523PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICOL, P. J., pro tem.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the superior court of Stanislaus County of the crime of practicing medicine without a license, and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. The information charged the defendant with a violation of section 17 of the State Medical Practice Act (Stats. 1913, p. 734), the said information alléging that: “The said Poo On on or about the nineteenth day of September A. D. 1919, at and in the said county of Stanislaus, state of California, and prior to the filing of this information, did…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. People v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People v. GrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. People v. LewandowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. PlylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. DozierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. State v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. DarnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API