Legal Opinion
D'AMICO v. Treat
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 10, 1974No. 74 C 82PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUER, District Judge.
This cause comes on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the instant complaint.
This is purportedly a pro se civil rights action seeking to redress the alleged deprivation of the plaintiff’s civil rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. The plaintiff alleges that this Court has jurisdiction over the instant action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332, and 1343.
The plaintiff, James M. P. D’Amico, is a citizen of the United States of America, a resident of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Jimenez v. PierceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Skilling v. Funk Aircraft CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1959
- Fallbrook Public Utility Dist. v. United States District Court, Southern District California, Southern DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Sutton v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PA.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marcial Ucin, S.A. v. SS GaliciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Marquest Medical Products, Inc. v. Emde Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1980
- State Ex Rel. White v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Lomanco, Inc. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1983
- Weatherhead Co. v. ColettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.