Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Department of Highways

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 30, 1963No. 20232PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pringle.

Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called Ruth, were plaintiffs or petitioners in the trial court, and defendant in error the Department of Highways, State of Colorado, hereinafter called the Department, was defendant or respondent.

Ruth is the owner of a parcel of land in Clear Creek County and of certain water and ditch rights and ditch or pipeline rights-of-way appurtenant thereto. State Highway 103 runs through a portion of Ruth’s land and the ditch or pipeline right-of-way passes under this highway.

In September of 1957 the Department filed a petition in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Mulford v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Ruth v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bristol Bay Productions, LLC v. LampackSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  2. Lakin Cattle Company v. EngelthalerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Linnebur v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. City of Englewood v. WeistSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. Saunders v. BankstonColorado Court of Appeals · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API