Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Ginn

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1997No. 95-0033; Crim.App. No. 9300190Published

1ConcurrenceGierke, Judge

I agree with the majority that appellant is not entitled to a factfinding hearing on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. I disagree with the legal standard used by the majority. The majority would grant appellant a hearing unless the record conclusively contradicts his affidavit. I believe that the correct standard would deny appellant a hearing unless he can overcome the presumption of verity accorded his sworn responses on the record. See Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 71, 74, 97 S.Ct. 1621, 1627-28,1629, 52 L.Ed.2d 136 (1977).

In my view the result reached by the court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Mohammed Y. ButtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Robert J. GiardinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Paul E. SandersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API