Commonwealth v. Scott
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.
This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the allowance of the defendant’s motion to suppress after we had vacated a motion judge’s initial allowance of the motion to suppress and remanded the case to the Superior Court for further proceedings. See Commonwealth v. Scott, 52 Mass. App. Ct. 486, 496 (2001). We reverse.
In response to our remand order, the judge held a hearing. The only witness to testify at the hearing was the arresting officer, a State trooper, who also had testified at the initial hearing. In his original decision, the judge found that the officer had shone a spotlight at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. YesilcimanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. MercadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. Isaiah I.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. CataldoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. CastilloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. GrantMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.