Legal Opinion
Herrington v. DAIMLERCHTYSLER CORP.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 2, 2003No. 3:02-cv-07403PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Douglas Herrington brings this case against defendant DaimlerChrysler Corp. claiming termination in violation of O.R.C. § 4113.52(A)(1). This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion shall be granted.
BACKGROUND
In October, 1999, defendant Daimler-Chrysler, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Michigan, hired plaintiff, an Ohio resident, as a Health and Safety Supervisor for defendant’s Toledo North Assembly Plant in Toledo,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kovac v. Superior Dairy, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Asamoah v. Capstone Logistics, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Carovac v. Deepwood CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Davis v. Marriott Intl IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Tucker v. Alvis, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.