Stoudt v. Shepherd
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton. (Hooker, J.) Case for seduction. Plaintiff brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This suit, which was begun in 1880, when defendant was a minor, was brought to recover damages for the seduction of plaintiff’s daughter Emma, who was also a minor. On a first trial plaintiff recovered over $3,000. A second trial granted by the circuit court of Eaton county reached no result. A third trial resulted in a verdict of $20, which was the exact amount of certain money expenses. Plantiff brings error, alleging several grounds, some of which relate to rulings on testimony, and the rest to the various ways in which it is claimed the court below - subjected plaintiff to improper…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watson v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Johnston v. DisbrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. MillspaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Watson v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Dalman v. KoningMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rabeke v. BaerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Rosenberg v. MagedaMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Peterson v. CrosierUtah Supreme Court · 1905
- Hein v. HoldridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Kralick v. ShuttleworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.