Legal Opinion
L. A. Cnty. Metro. Transp. Auth. v. Yum Yum Donut Shops, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 26, 2019No. B276280PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBendix, J.
*665Plaintiff Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) sued defendant Yum Yum Donut Shops, Inc. (Yum Yum) in eminent domain to take1 one of Yum Yum's donut shops that was in the path of a proposed rail line. Yum Yum sought compensation for the loss of goodwill resulting from that taking under Code of Civil Procedure section 1263.510 ( section 1263.510 ).2 Under that statute, a condemnee must establish in a court trial entitlement to goodwill, including whether the loss of goodwill cannot be prevented by relocating or making other reasonable mitigation efforts. It is that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Keyes v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- State Department of Health Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thee Aguila, Inc. v. Century Law Grp., LLP, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Thee Aguila v. Century Law GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019