Legal Opinion

Bell v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 22, 2017No. 3:15–cv–198 (VAB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Michael Bell and Colleen Bell ("Plaintiffs"), married and living in Killingworth, Connecticut, filed this lawsuit against the United States of America, the United States Department of Treasury, and the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") (collectively, "Defendants"), seeking the return of money withheld from their income taxes in 2008. Compl. 1, ECF No. 1. The Bells claim that Dr. Bell's former employer, Pfizer, submitted an incorrect IRS Form W-2, based in part on a settlement agreement reached between Dr. Bell and Pfizer, that resulted in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Brown v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kiczuk v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
  2. Welch v. Bio-Reference Labortories, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API