Legal Opinion
Williams v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 2006No. 03-CV-1271PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Senior Judge:
I
The Consumers United Insurance Company (“CUIC”) appeals the Superior Court’s decision to grant appellee District of Columbia’s motion for summary judgment. CUIC argues that the District of Columbia defrauded CUIC when the parties entered into an agreement in which the District’s agents lacked the authority to bind the District. We detect no error, and therefore, affirm.
II
In 1985, CUIC entered into a “Tri-Party Agreement” (“the Agreement”) with the District of Columbia’s Department of Housing and Community Development (“DHCD”) and the Trust for Public Land (“TPL”) in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. LeavittSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- New York Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Los Angeles Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Chicago Helicopter Airways, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wright v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Washington Investment Partners of Delaware, LLC v. Securities HouseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY v. ST. ALBANS SCHOOLDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Gilbert v. MiodovnikDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Springfield Parcel C, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.