Legal Opinion
Bryceland v. AT & T CORP.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided November 27, 2000No. 3:99-cv-02279PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs filed two class action lawsuits against AT & T Corporation and AT & T Wireless Services, Inc. (“AT & T”). One case was filed in federal court. The other was filed in state court. AT & T removed the state court action to federal court and the cases were consolidated. Plaintiffs now move to remand the state case. AT & T has filed a motion to dismiss both class action complaints. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs’ motion to remand the state case is granted and the federal case is dismissed sua sponte for lack…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Spielholz v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- TPS Utilicom Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency EmissionsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Gilmore v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Consolidated Telephone Cooperative v. Western Wireless Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.