Legal Opinion

3M Company v. Neology, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 28, 2019No. N18C-07-089 AML CCLDPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 3M COMPANY Plaintiff, C.A. NO.: N18C-07-089 AML CCLD Vv. NEOLOGY, INC. and ONE EQUITY PARTNERS VI, L.P., New Newer Neer” Nee Nee Nee Nee ree” Nee eee” Defendants. Submitted: March 25, 2019 Decided: June 28, 2019 Upon Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendant Neology, Inc.’s First Amended Counterclaim: Granted in Part, Denied in Part MEMORANDUM OPINION Rafael X. Zahralddin-Aravena, Esquire, Jonathan M. Stemerman, Esquire of ELLIOTT GREENLEAF, P.C., Wilmington, Delaware, and Lawrence M. Shapiro, Esquire, Sybil L. Dunlop, Esquire of GREENE ESPEL PLLP,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Central Mortgage Co. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. Nemec v. ShraderSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  3. Kuroda v. SPJS Holdings, L.L.C.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  4. Spence v. FunkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Ramunno v. CawleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API