Nix v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant, Earnest Ray Nix, appeals from the circuit court's denial of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition, in which he attacked his 1998 convictions for trafficking in cocaine and the unlawful distribution of cocaine. We affirmed Nix's convictions on direct appeal. Nix v. State,747 So.2d 351 (Ala.Crim.App. 1999).
Nix alleged in his Rule 32 petition (1) that his conviction was obtained by action of a grand or petit jury that, he says, was unconstitutionally selected and impaneled; and (2) that he was denied the effective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. Nix subsequently amended…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ex Parte LawleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Jones v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Tarver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte BenfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Fortner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.