Legal Opinion

State v. Ingram

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2011No. ED 94866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Presiding Judge.

Introdtiction

Amos Ingram (Ingram) appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for drug trafficking in the second degree, possession of a controlled substance, unlawful possession of a firearm, and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. He asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his motions to suppress statements and evidence, because the State of Missouri failed to present the search warrant involved in the case. Because we find that the trial court erred in denying Ingram’s motions to suppress, we reverse and remand for further…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. State v. StepterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. NeherSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. NebbittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ANGELA MEGAN GUINNMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ANGELA MEGAN GUINNMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State of Missouri v. Kathryn AventMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State of Missouri v. Kathryn AventMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API