Legal Opinion

State v. Narcisse

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1989No. 88-426PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant has appealed from convictions of first degree sexual assault and first degree false imprisonment, following a trial by jury. He assigns as errors the insufficiency of the corroboration testimony and the refusal of the trial court to give instructions on lesser-included offenses. We affirm.

A verdict in a criminal case must be sustained if the evidence, viewed and construed most favorably to the State, is sufficient to support that verdict. State v. McDonald, 230 Neb. 85, 430 N.W.2d 282 (1988).

On the evening of June 16, 1987, the defendant offered the victim a ride to McDonald’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. TamburanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. LynchNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. BlairNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. BoppreNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. RowlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re Interest of AMHNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API