Legal Opinion
Mirkin v. Cintas Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 8, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-4748PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Presently before me is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff commenced the underlying action in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas pursuant to Pennsylvania’s Wage Payment and Collection Law, 43 P.S.Ann. §§ 260.1-.45. (Purdon Supp. 1981-1982). Defendant properly removed the action to this court. 1
Plaintiff alleges that he was an employee of defendant who was dismissed by defendant without notice. Under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement, plaintiff claims to be entitled to: (1) two weeks salary since plaintiff was dismissed without…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sendi v. NCR Comten, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Pa. Dept. of Labor & Industry v. Remsburg, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County1988