Legal Opinion

Kimball State Bank v. Kimball Roller Mills

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1929No. File No. 6573Published

1Opinion of the Court

MIS'ER, C.

On April 24, 1922, Kimball Roller Mills executed a negotiable promissory note for $4,000 to> the appellant, Kimball *553State Bank. Oil May 4, 1922, it executed like notes for $3,000 and $2,000 to the same payee. These notes not being paid at maturity, appellant brought suit thereon, setting forth copies thereof, alleging their execution and nonpayment. The complaint also alleged that, at the time of the making of each of said notes and prior to delivery to the bank, defendants Wright, Beebe, Dyer, and Novotny, “each for himself, indorsed said note for the purpose of inducing said bank…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haddock, Blanchard Co. v. . HaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Thompson v. CurryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Briscol v. American Southern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Wittemann v. . SandsNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. McCluskey v. WileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API