Legal Opinion

State v. Bispham

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 8, 1999No. SC 15925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was granted improvidently.1

The appeal is dismissed.

We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court; State v. Bispham, 48 Conn. App. 135, 708 A.2d 604 (1998); limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a written statement of the complainant as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BisphamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. State v. BisphamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SenquizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. State v. John G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API