Legal Opinion
Bailey v. A Place for Rover
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 29, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02860Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA K.T., R.D., and KAITLIN BAILEY, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, NO. 23-02858 v. NO. 23-02859 NO. 23-02860 A PLACE FOR ROVER and ANTOINE SMITH Defendants. MEMORANDUM RE: MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND FOR RECONSIDERATION Baylson, J. March 29, 2024 Pending before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaints and for Reconsideration of this Court’s October 31, 2023 Order granting Rover’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay (“Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend and Reconsideration”).1 ECF No.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Stanford Shane Otis Terrell Robert Stewart v. William Fauver, Commissioner James Barbo, Administrator Rogers, Chief Director of CustodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.