Legal Opinion

(HC) Hatchett v. Clark

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 1, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00228Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CECIL JEROME HATCHETT, No. 2:21-cv-00228 GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 KEN CLARK, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or 19 paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See

28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be 20 provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API