Rose v. Lundy
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
455 U.S. 509 (1982)
ROSE, WARDEN
v.
LUNDY
No. 80-846.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 14, 1981
Decided March 3, 1982
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
John C. Zimmermann, Assistant Attorney General of Tennessee argued the cause pro hac vice for petitioner. With him on the briefs was William M. Leech, Jr., Attorney General.
D. Shannon Smith, by appointment of the Court, 451 U. S. 904, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · O'ConnorJustice O'Connor
In this case we consider whether the exhaustion rule in 28 U. S. C. §§ 2254 (b), (c) requires a federal district…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Brennan; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · White; Dissent.
3Cases cited77 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by43 opinions
- Eric Mann v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- (DP) (HC) Mills v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (HC) Barnes v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (HC) Barton v. BeddickDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) Bretz v. United States District CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.