Commonwealth v. Sasser
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pur Curiam,
Appellant Robert Sasser’s judgment of sentence upon conviction of second degree murder is affirmed. This Court will not consider appellant’s contention that his extrajudicial statement should have been suppressed because the fruit of an unlawful arrest in view of his failure to raise that issue pretrial as required by Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 323(b). Appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to show his participation in the murder is meritless. Commonwealth v. Robb, 284 Pa. 99, 139 A. 392 (1925). See also Commonwealth v. Pierce, 437 Pa. 266,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. RobbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BrittainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. BlagmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. BlagmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.