Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Robb

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1925No. Appeal, 264PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The defendant, Robb, while confined in the Eastern Penitentiary, became an intimate of two men, Hayes and Reisinger, the latter having been formerly employed as a brakeman on the Baltimore Division of the Pennsylvania Railroad. The three conceived the plan of robbing the freight stations along this line, and disposing of the goods obtained. Robb and Hayes were first released from imprisonment, and both went to live in the house of the last named in Delaware County. Several warehouses having been burglarized, officers were placed at various points to detect and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ExlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Commonwealth v. MicusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Commonwealth v. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Weston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. BolishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. LowrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Commonwealth v. DorisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. GooslinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API