Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #442]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
The Court granted summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of Sony and other television manufacturers (“the Non-Soundview Parties”), concluding that there was no genuine issue of material fact for trial and the Non-Soundview Parties were entitled to judgment as a matter of law on their assertion that the parental control feature of the televisions they manufacture does not infringe Soundview’s patent on a similar parental control feature. See Sony Elecs., Inc. v. Soundview Techs., Inc., 225 F.Supp.2d 164…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sony Electronics, Inc. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003