Legal Opinion

Village of Lynbrook v. Cadoo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., vote for affirmance, being of opinion that the annexation proceedings were void and that, therefore, respondents’ property is not within the village; Lazansky, P. J., concurs, but is of opinion that under the Village Law the county clerk was not otherwise warranted in filing respondents’ map. The Village Law does not authorize the relief prayed for in paragraph B of the complaint, and to have granted the relief sought in paragraph C would have deprived respondents of their property without due process of law; Carswell, J.,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-On-HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API