Legal Opinion

Jarl Co. v. Village of Croton-On-Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1931Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting motion to dismiss amended complaint and judgment entered thereon reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendants to answer within twenty days from the entry of the order herein. We are of opinion that the amended complaint states a cause of action. (Village of Lynbrook v. Cadoo, 226 App. Div. 681; revd. on other grounds, 252 N. Y. 308.) Lazansky, P. J., Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Seudder, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm, with the following memorandum: The question for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Village of Lynbrook v. CadooNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Prankard v. CooleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Village of Lynbrook v. CadooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API