Nusbaum v. Nusbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
The second amended complaint was properly dismissed by the order appealed from, upon the ground that the cause of action is barred by the Statute of Limitations. The action has been brought by a wife to set aside as improvident *316a separation agreement entered into on June 21, 1939. The parties were married in 1926. The wife alleges that defendant husband earned from $20,000 to $25,000 when the agreement was signed. It provided $80 per week for her support and for the maintenance and education of two children, eleven and eight years old, and that these weekly payments would be reduced by $20…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Schmelzel v. SchmelzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Haas v. HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Leffler v. LefflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Curry v. CholletteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1977
- Belaustegui v. BelausteguiNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Saggese v. SaggeseCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.