In re Anonymous
New York City Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtRalph Diamond, J.
At the request and consent of the parties, the court has not used the true names of the parties in writing its decision. This matter involves two married couples who switched partners. For the purpose of simplification and identification, the court has used the following fictitious names and identifies the parties as follows:
carol — The herein petitioner, is the former wife of Bob, is not presently married and is residing with Ted.
bob — The herein respondent, is the former husband of Carol and is presently married to Alice.
*802ted — The former husband of Alice, is not presently married and is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Johnson v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- McMains v. McMainsNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Auburn Draying Co. v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Northrup v. NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Citron v. CitronNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Virginia B. v. Richard B.New York Family Court · 1984
- Pattberg v. PattbergNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Philson v. PhilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.