Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Barber Steamship Lines

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by seaman to recover for overtime work.

1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.

The plaintiff shipped as a seaman on one of the defendant’s steamships, the Sagaporack, on July 1, 1919. The usual shipping articles were signed by the parties. The plaintiff agreed to work as an able bodied seaman at the rate of seventy-five dollars a month and board. The articles contained the following clause in the handwriting of the United States shipping commissioner: “ In event of a general change in wages while vessel is away, said change to take effect from date of change.” The shipping articles contained no provision specifying the hours which the plaintiff was required to work. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kirchner v. New Home Sewing MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Rosenberg v. DoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. The David PrattDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1839
  4. Geller v. Kings County Mortgage Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alice D. v. William M.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1982
  2. Epstein v. KaplanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  3. Jones v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API