Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Doe

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 29, 1888PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action by a seaman against the master of a vessel to recover a balance of wages alleged to be due. *192The defendant denies the liability, and also sets up a release executed before a shipping commissioner under the U. S. Rev. Sts. § 4552. The plaintiff is a Finnish sailor, and speaks the English language very imperfectly. At the trial he testified that he did not know the contents of the release when he signed it, and did so thinking it was a mere receipt for the money actually received. He also testified to circumstances which he relied on as showing fraud on the part of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. O'Donnell v. Inhabitants of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Leddy v. BarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lee v. Allied Sports Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Bliss v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Cox v. . Lykes BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Wagner v. National Life Ins. Co. of MontpelierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  5. McNamara v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API