Legal Opinion

Bolumbu v. Barr

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided May 7, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00392Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION NATACHA INGONGA BOLUMBU, § § Petitioner, § § v. § 1:20-CV-392-RP § WILLIAM BARR, et al. § § Respondents. § MEMORANDUM On May 5, 2020, the Court set a telephonic hearing for May 8, 2020, on its order to show cause for why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued for Petitioner Natacha Ingonga Bolumbu (“Bolumbu”).1 (Show Cause Order, Dkt. 8; Hearing Order, Dkt. 11); see 28 U.S.C. § 2243. At the hearing, the parties should be prepared to discuss the following issues, supplementing those which they have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Nadarajah v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Jonathan O. Madu v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Jones v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Gustavo Gutierrez-Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API