Legal Opinion

B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Hockmeyer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2208Published

1Opinion of the Court

40 F.2d 99 (1930)

B. F. GOODRICH CO.

v.

HOCKMEYER (ZIP-ON MFG. CO. Substituted).

Patent Appeal No. 2208.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 14, 1930.

Eakin & Avery, of Akron, Ohio (William D. Eakin, of Akron, Ohio, of counsel), for appellant.

James R. Hodder, of Boston, Mass., for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences denying the application of appellant for the cancellation of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API