Legal Opinion
Dangler v. Central Mortgage Co. (In Re Dangler)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 16, 1987No. 19-11142PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The instant Adversary proceeding is in the form of an attack on the Proof of Claim of a Mortgagee filed by the Debtors, husband and wife in a joint Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. The Debtors assert that the Claim should be reduced by $2,000.00 due to their purported right to recoup this sum as against the Mortgagee due to alleged violations of the federal Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq. (hereinafter referred to as “TILA”), in the disclosure statement (hereinafter referred to as “the Statement”) presented to the Debtors in the mortgage…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Philip R. Bizier v. Globe Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- New York Guardian Mortgage Corp. v. DietzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- MECO REALTY CO. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Jungkurth v. Eastern Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Rhoda Jungkurth)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Household Consumer Discount Co. v. VespazianiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re JordanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Soto v. PNC Bank (In Re Soto)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Associates Home Eq. Servs. v. TroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Woolaghan v. United Mortgage Services, Inc. (In Re Woolaghan)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Smith v. Kissell Co. (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.