Legal Opinion

Doe Ex Dem. Windsor Realty Co. v. Finnegan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1923No. 6 Div. 751PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County ; C. B. Smith, Judge. Action by John Doe, on the demise of the Windsor Realty Company, against Mary E. Finnegan. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. No brief reached the Reporter. No brief reached the Reporter.

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

[1, 2] On a former appeal in this case a judgment for'the present appellee was reversed on the ground that the trial court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. Again we have reached, the conclusion that the trial court should have granted appellant’s motion for a new trial, but doubt whether it may not be better to omit any discussion of the evidence which has led to this conclusion. However, we state in outline the facts as we find, them: Appellee was interested in the estate of one Hewitt, deceased, who died seized and possessed of the land in controversy. In 1887, she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doe ex dem. Hughes v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Beasley v. HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Saltmarsh v. CrommelinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Snow v. BraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Gary v. WoodhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moorer v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. McNeil v. KetchensAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Doe Ex Dem. Windsor Realty Co. v. FinneganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Doe Ex Dem. Windsor Realty Co. v. FinneganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API