Legal Opinion

Hill v. State Ex Rel. County Attorney of Grady County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1915No. 4914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from. District Cou t, Grady County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Proceedings by the State, on the relation of the County Attor-' ney of Grady County and another, against Dave Hill and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was a proceeding, instituted under that part of section 14, article 3, chapter 69, Session Laws 1907-08, as amended by section 13, chapter 70, Session Laws 19.11, which provides:

“* * * And all places where any such liquor is kept or possessed by any person in violation of any provision of this act; and all places where persons congregate or resort for the purpose of drinking any such liquor, are hereby declared to be public nuisances, and upon the judgment of any court of record finding such place to- be a nuisance under this section, the sheriff, his deputy, or undersheriff, or any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Purcell Bridge & Transfer Co. v. HineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Taby v. McMurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gragg v. State Ex Rel. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Key v. State Ex Rel. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Balch v. State Ex Rel. GrigsbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. McNulty v. State Ex Rel. SeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Hewes v. State Ex Rel. GurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API