Legal Opinion

McNulty v. State Ex Rel. Seaver

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1923No. 13811PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochean, J.

This action was instituted by the county attorney of Tulsa county to have the Mid-Continent Park declared a nuisance and abated. The petition contain-' ed two counts. The first count alleged that the premises were being used for the purposes of violating the prohibition law, and the second cause of action alleged that the defendants used certain premises for conducting dog races on which books were made and money was bet and wagered, won and lost, in violation of the la'ws of the state of Oklahoma, and that a dance hall and cafe were operated on said premises as a public resort where lewd and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoperCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. State v. NeaseOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Ex Parte AllisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Carroll v. Grande Ronde Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. STATE ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  2. Stout v. PardoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Oklahoma Kennel Club v. State Ex Rel. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Roedl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. State Ex Rel. Callihan v. Wokan Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API